Climate Opponents – CA Climate Accountability Project

Lobby spending and campaign finance reports have been released for 2023, and one thing is clear: the grip Big oil and gas has on California’s political landscape is stronger than ever.

In 2023 (a non-election year!), the oil and gas industry poured over $1 million into the pockets of California candidates and spent nearly $22 million lobbying against critical climate bills. Sempra Energy stood out as the largest corporate contributor to California Legislators in 2023. This influx of money was strategically deployed to try to deepen influence and delay progress on climate solutions in California. 

Breaking Down the Numbers

The influence of big oil and gas is widespread, with more than three-quarters of California’s legislators receiving fossil fuel money in 2023. This includes 72% of Democrats and 96% of Republicans, indicating a bipartisan attempt to buy influence on the state’s environmental progress. This concerted effort by oil and gas to attempt to control California’s legislative agenda highlights a glaring conflict: while these companies report billions in profits and their CEOs enjoy multi-million dollar paychecks, they spend millions to obstruct the transition to clean energy and maintain high energy prices, leaving California families to bear the burden.

Check out CCAP’s updated Climate Scorecard HERE to see which oil and gas companies are contributing to California legislators and learn how those legislators are voting on key climate policies.

The dirty little secret about green California, a global leader on climate policies, is that Big Oil still wins a lot of its political fights.
How big oil wins in green California, Calmatters, 12/19/2023

2023’s lobby expenditure reports have been released from the Secretary of State and they are sounding the alarm for any Californian concerned about the health of our communities, the climate, and the state’s transition to a cleaner, more prosperous economy. Last year, the Oil & Gas industry doubled down on its opposition to consumer and climate-friendly policies in California, spending more money lobbying legislators than in any session since 2017.  

Chevron ($11.1 million) and the Western States Petroleum Association ($6.9 million) were two of the top three organizations spending the most on lobbying last year . They were in good company with five other Oil & Gas giants – Sempra Energy ($1.4 million), Phillips 66 ($802,000), Calpine ($446,000), Valero ($598,000), and ExxonMobil ($460,000) – combining to spend more than $22.3 million to fight bills to protect consumers from oil price-gouging, require corporations to account for their climate impacts and climate-related financial risk, and set stricter bonding requirements for Oil & Gas wells.

The influx of Oil & Gas money into Sacramento was due, in part, to Governor Gavin Newsom’s special legislative session in April 2023 to impose a new windfall profit tax on oil companies in response to the “outrageous and unconscionable” rising gasoline prices in California. Assailing industry greed and influence in Sacramento, the Governor told a Climate Week panel that “Sacramento may be dominated by Democrats, but many of us are wholly owned subsidiaries of the fossil fuel industry.

 In the end the law was significantly watered down amid opposition from the trades unions and the oil industry.”

Industry lobbying comes on top of the millions Oil & Gas interests have made in campaign contributions and independent expenditures on behalf of lawmakers in recent elections, and the industry has used that influence to attempt to rig the political system in California and push an agenda to burn more fossil fuels. 

Despite a pledge by the California Democratic Party to refuse to accept campaign contributions from fossil fuel companies, 77% of all Democratic Assemblymembers and State Senators took contributions from oil and/or gas companies. 

The California Climate Accountability Project keeps an eye on these contributions and how they may impact legislators’ votes on climate issues. Our updated climate scorecard reflects all of the 2023 legislative votes. 

Are you curious about how a legislator voted on climate issues? Wondering how much money their campaigns received from Oil & Gas? Take a look at the new scores on our interactive webtool.

California prides itself on safe communities and a clean future. But Oil & Gas companies are playing a dangerous game, consistently harming the environment and public health.

CCAP’s new interactive map lets you explore how Oil & Gas activities may be impacting your neighborhood.

Specific examples include:

  • Misusing ratepayer dollars to fight climate action: Californians pay for reliable energy, not to block solutions for a cleaner future.
    • SoCalGas Billed At Least $36 Million To Ratepayers For Political Lobbying To Undermine California Policies Aimed At The Climate Crisis Between 2019 And 2023
  • Suing communities for health protections: Shouldn’t these companies be prioritizing the health of Californians?
    • Chevron & PBF Energy Recently Sued the Air District Over New Bay Area Refinery Pollution Rule
  • Neglecting to properly maintain oil infrastructure: Leaking pipes near homes, schools, and hospitals pose a serious risk.
    • Chevron Allowed Cymric Oil Field Spill To For 113 Days, Spilling 1.2 Million Gallons Of Oil & Wastewater

 

Big Oil and Gas’s greed is putting Californians at risk. 

SEARCH THE MAP: HAS OIL & GAS BEEN A BAD NEIGHBOR TO YOU? 

The California Climate Accountability Project has released its updated climate scorecard to reflect all of the 2023 legislative votes. The updated scorecard showcases California’s climate leaders and California’s climate laggards. Curious about how a legislator voted on climate issues? Wondering how much money their campaigns received from Oil & Gas? Take a look at the new scores on the California Climate Accountability Project’s interactive webtool.

As California faces the growing challenges of climate change, including wildfires, droughts, and extreme heat, residents are asking more from legislators on climate and clean energy. In fact, 70% say they want the electricity grid to run on 100% renewable energy by 2035. Thus, it is paramount that our elected officials uphold promises and act as responsible stewards of our environment, properly representing constituents. 

2023 was another important year for climate legislation in California. Several key climate bills crossed the governor’s desk this year. The below bills have been added to the scorecard from the 2023 legislative session. These bills are critical to California’s clean energy future and residents should be able to easily understand how their legislators voted on these bills. The 2023 climate bills that have been added to the scorecard are:

We know that California politics isn’t always black and white and not every legislator who accepts Oil & Gas money allows it to influence their vote. However, it is clear that the fossil fuel industry is constantly trying to buy power and influence. While perhaps some Californians would not be surprised that certain Republicans received Oil & Gas funding and then were aligned with the oil and gas industry in opposing climate legislation, several Democrats also failed to protect California’s climate. In total, seven Democrats both accepted financial contributions from oil and gas and failed to support any of the climate bills detailed above. They are:

  • Marie Alvarado-Gil (Senator, District 4)
  • Jasmeet Bains (Assemblymember, District 35)
  • Mike Gipson (Assemblymember, District 65)
  • Tim Grayson (Assemblymember, District 15)
  • Blanca Rubio (Assemblymember, District 48)
  • Esmeralda Soria (Assemblymember, District 27)
  • Carlos Villapudua (Assemblymember, District 13)

2024 is a seminal year for climate and clean energy legislation in California and across the country because scientists say we must rapidly reduce emissions and limit warming to avoid the most devastating and irreversible impacts of climate change.. We’ll continue to ensure that the public knows when legislators take Oil & Gas money and subsequently do not support critical climate legislation. Stay tuned throughout the year for more updates and information on your legislator’s climate accountability. 

The California Climate Accountability Project urges Californians to examine their legislators – explore our webtool to access comprehensive information about legislators’ voting records and financial ties to Oil & Gas interests.

There has been a lot of noise around hydrogen recently. President Biden recently announced that the Department of Energy is awarding $7 billion to 7 regional “hydrogen hubs”, intended to spur the development of hydrogen infrastructure in the U.S. – California alone will be receiving up to $1.2 billion for hydrogen projects. It’s a big deal for hydrogen advocates, and if done right, a big deal for clean energy. But, as with anything involving hydrogen energy, there is both promise and peril

The promise of hydrogen is actually very simple. If we can find a way to produce hydrogen from 100% renewable energy like wind and solar, we can make important strides in our emission reductions in sectors that are hard to decarbonize, like shipping and aviation. That’s good news for the climate and good news for communities. The perils of hydrogen are much more complicated, but most derive from the fact that currently, 95% of hydrogen relies on fossil fuels for production and Oil & Gas companies will stop at nothing to keep it that way. 

With a growing emphasis on hydrogen, Oil & Gas executives and their lobbyists are working to ensure today’s hydrogen benefits them and remains fossil fuel hydrogen. They’ve spent millions of dollars lobbying to get consumers to pay for the expansion of fossil fuel hydrogen — an unproven and expensive technology that will lock in costs for decades. They’ve spent big dollars promoting hydrogen in advertising and trying to confuse the issue and mislead Californians by claiming it’s clean energy. The industry’s attempts to conflate their version of hydrogen with hydrogen derived from renewables – also known as green hydrogen – is an attempt to boost profits and block California’s responsible transition to clean energy. It will be the responsibility of California’s elected officials to ensure that the money for California’s hydrogen hub will be used exclusively for green hydrogen, derived from clean energy, and not more fossil fuel hydrogen. 

Oil & Gas companies thrive off of creating confusion in the hydrogen debate. So we wanted to give you some straight facts about what green hydrogen is, what it is not, and what Oil & Gas companies are doing to ensure tomorrow’s hydrogen is fossil-fuel dependent. 

(Download the full CCAP Hydrogen Fact Sheet HERE)

Here’s what some other groups are saying about California’s hydrogen future:

California Environmental Justice Organizations: “Equity Principles for Hydrogen”

  • “We adamantly oppose all non-green hydrogen proposals and projects. We insist that new projects protect communities first and do not perpetuate the injustices that polluting infrastructures impose on fence-line communities today.”

Earthjustice: “Reclaiming Hydrogen for a Clean Energy Future” 

  • “When used as a marketing tool by the fossil fuel industry, hydrogen can be used to hinder necessary climate action. But when reclaimed and deployed as a solution to decarbonize sectors we cannot otherwise electrify, green hydrogen can play an important role in a zero-emission future”

The Climate Center: Statement on the Hydrogen Hub announcement 

  • “Without proper guardrails, hydrogen production could both increase greenhouse gas emissions and further disadvantage communities that are already on the frontlines of fossil fuel pollution.”

The Climate Center: Hydrogen Policy Brief

  • “Hydrogen, and only green hydrogen, should only be considered in cases where electrification is not an option. Hydrogen should never be deployed to extend the life of fossil fuel infrastructure, nor should it replace or delay direct electrification.”
Fossil Fuel Hydrogen Is Polluting And Expensive.
The Oil & Gas Industry Is Trying To Squeeze Public Money For Their Schemes.
  • Today, the industry is pressuring regulators and lawmakers for access to funding that is supposed to be for clean energy. They’re trying to convince policymakers to use fossil fuel hydrogen to keep demand for their product and justify the building of polluting pipelines.
  • Right now, the IRS is determining what actually counts as clean hydrogen, and there are over $1 billion in subsidies on the line. Money that could be going toward real climate solutions like building out renewable energy, including wind and solar. Oil companies are urging leaders to make the standards as relaxed as possible so they can squeeze out profits.
California’s Leading Climate Obstructionist Shouldn’t Get To Set Energy Policy In The State.

In politics, money often means influence. In Sacramento, you can’t talk about influence without talking about Sempra Energy – no other company in California has attempted to buy more influence thus far in 2023. As reported in the Sacramento Bee, in the first half of this year, Sempra has been the single largest corporate contributor to California legislators and has spent heavily on lobbying the legislature and Public Utility Commission, including opposing major climate legislation focused on holding corporations accountable for their climate pollution and financial risk. 

Despite a pledge by the California Democratic Party to refuse to accept campaign contributions from fossil fuel companies, 72 out of 94 – 76.6 percent – of all Democratic Assemblymembers and State Senators took contributions from oil and/or gas companies. Sempra contributed $252,178 to California legislative candidates in just the first two quarters of 2023 (an off-election year), nearly all of it to sitting legislators, a total higher than any of the company’s first and second-quarter amounts since at least 2015. Its influence peddling also includes retaining at least six lobby firms, in addition to a team of in-house lobbyists, spending nearly one million dollars in the first two quarters of 2023.

As California gets serious about finding solutions to the climate crisis, it is clear we must reduce our dependence on natural gas and other fossil fuels. And yet, Sempra consistently opposes policies that would set zero-emission goals for cars and trucks, electrify buildings, and promote renewable energy. Sempra is spending ratepayer dollars on marketing and political influence in a cynical attempt to reposition itself as part of the solution while simultaneously pursuing an anti-climate political agenda. 

Sempra vigorously fought to undermine the adoption of zero-emissions technologies like electric vehicles, appliances, and buildings, instead promoting carve-outs for natural gas – but there is nothing “clean” about natural gas. Sempra knows the truth, as they face a $175,000 fine for claiming their natural gas was ‘renewable’ when more than 95 percent of what they deliver to customers is derived from fossil fuels.

In fact, analysis of the climate impacts associated with natural gas at all stages of development — from drilling and processing to transporting and combusting — just keeps getting worse. Methane (the main component of natural gas) is 84 times more potent as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide in the short term. Leaks, venting, and flaring of natural gasses are also responsible for a range of other public health and pollution issues. Oil and gas supply chain methane emissions were 16 million metric tons in 2019, enough wasted gas to fuel 10 million homes, and adding natural gas vehicles to California roads will contribute to the state’s ozone and climate problems.

In light of the influence of Sempra and similar organizations on California’s policymakers, The CA Climate Accountability Project web tool serves as a vital resource to hold our legislators accountable for the money they take from oil & gas. With 79 percent of state legislators accepting oil and gas campaign funds and 16 of the top 20 recipients earning a D or F grade on climate action, this tool empowers Californians to demand transparency and climate-forward decisions from their elected officials. 

June 29, 2023

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Veronica Milliken

vmilliken@wearerally.com

 650.823.4997

Is Your Legislator a California Climate Champion? 

Climate scorecard allows Californians to track oil and gas contributions and legislator votes 

(SACRAMENTO, CA) 79 percent of California legislators accept campaign money from the oil and gas industry, and 16 of the top 20 recipients earned a D or F grade on climate action, according to a new webtool and climate scorecard released today by the California Climate Accountability Project (CCAP).

 With the launch of the tool, CCAP is shining a light on the millions the oil and gas industry is spending to influence California policy makers, while also spotlighting the climate champions who vote for California’s future.

 By entering their zip code, Californians can get information about their legislators’ industry campaign contributions, as well as a Climate Score based on votes on key recent climate bills.

Despite a pledge by the California Democratic Party to refuse to accept campaign contributions from oil and gas interests, 72 out of 94 – 76.6 percent – of all Democratic Assemblymembers and State Senators took contributions from oil and/or gas companies. Oil and gas industry influence takes many forms, including direct campaign contributions and independent expenditure campaigns as well as millions more in lobbying regulators and state legislators to oppose policy and regulation meant to build out California’s solar and wind resources, improve its electric vehicle infrastructure and transition buildings to zero-emissions energy. 

“We support the climate champions in our legislature who are putting our state on the path to a climate-safe future,” said Ellie Cohen, CEO of The Climate Center. “But California isn’t making progress fast enough and it’s because of oil and gas money in Sacramento. Legislators need to side with people, not polluters, and reject campaign contributions from oil and gas interests. Together, we will hold our lawmakers accountable and secure the accelerated, equitable climate solutions that Californians deserve.”

“For too long, fossil fuel companies have funded legislators in Sacramento, rigging the system against low-income, BIPOC communities,” said Raquel Mason, Policy Manager at California Environmental Justice Alliance. “They have avoided scrutiny. That’s about to change. Our legislators need to stand up for the health and future of all Californians, rather than working behind the scenes to protect corporate profits.”

California’s legislators are considering several critical bills, including SB252, SB253 and SB261 that could bolster the state’s climate ambitions, and each will come with a fight from special interests. CCAP will continue to call attention to the voting patterns of legislators in Sacramento. 

 

For more information: https://caclimateaccountability.org

# # #

California is at a crossroads.

Last legislative session, state legislators passed critical policies to curb emissions and protect Californians from pollution. But there’s still work to do to keep California a global climate leader. We need to close loopholes allowing corporations to greenwash and the state to invest in dirty energy. 

This legislative session, California has an opportunity to hold the oil and gas industry and other polluters accountable for their climate impacts. Right now, state legislators are considering a climate package that would:

We can’t allow the fossil fuel industry to continue to mislead and manipulate Californians. We deserve to know how much large corporations are contributing to climate change and for the state to stop empowering the fossil fuel industry through investments. 

It’s time for legislators to pick a side— corporate greed or California’s climate future. 

 

With a bureaucratic name and departments filled with engineers and scientists, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) tends to fly below the radar, but make no mistake, it plays a critical role in California’s effort to fight climate change, reduce air pollution and protect the health of overburdened communities living at the fence lines of Southern California’s biggest polluters. 

 On December 2, 2022, SCAQMD will finalize its 2022 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), and without dramatic improvements, the agency will miss the mark and come up short of addressing the magnitude of our air quality crisis. For too long, oil and gas industry lobbying has succeeded in creating special carve-outs for the industry at the expense of the health of Californians. 

By staff’s own estimates, to meet federal air quality standards, the region must reduce nitrous oxide (NOx) emissions by 83 percent. There is an urgent need to adopt zero emission technologies across all sectors and reduce the pollution impacts of diesel trucks pouring into the region that serves growing distribution and warehouse businesses in the Inland Empire and at the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles. 

Tell SCAQMD to stand up to oil and gas interests and approve a strong clean air plan that protects public health and the environment

SCAQMD is responsible for the air quality of a 6,700-square-mile basin spanning Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange counties. It regulates emissions from major polluters, like power plants and oil refineries and coordinates its efforts with the California Air Resources Board (CARB), which regulates cars and trucks, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which oversees interstate and international travel and commerce. Since 1979, SCAQMD has been out of compliance with all federal clean air standards for ozone, commonly known as smog. 

Southern California has the worst ozone pollution in the country, according to the American Lung Association’s 2022 State of the Air Report, and this year, the South Coast Air Basin had over 100 bad air days for ozone. 

Industry lobbyists are fighting to undermine the adoption of zero-emissions technologies like electric vehicles, and instead promoting carve outs for natural gas and continuing dependence on fossil fuels. There is nothing “clean” about natural gas, and the analysis of the climate impacts associated with natural gas at all stages of development — from drilling and processing to transporting and combusting — just keeps getting worse. Methane (the main component of natural gas) is 84 times more potent as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide in the short term. Leaks, venting and flaring of natural gas are also responsible for a range of other public health and pollution issues. Oil and gas supply chain methane emissions were 16 million metric tons in 2019, enough wasted gas to fuel 10 million homes, and adding natural gas vehicles to California roads will contribute to the state’s ozone and climate problems.

The California Natural Gas Vehicles Coalition is working to create a new definition of “near-zero emission” vehicles to delay the state’s transition to a zero-emission economy. The carve-out at SCAQMD is part of a broader, coordinated industry effort led by SoCalGas and others to repackage natural gas as a clean alternative and maintain robust markets for fossil fuels despite the need to reduce emissions to tackle ozone pollution and climate change. 

 Last year, Los Angeles and Long Beach officials considered a new policy to require zero-pollution electric trucks to replace diesel trucks at their ports, and decided to allow “near-zero emission” trucks (defined as natural gas trucks) after public testimony from local residents promoting the “near-zero” options. An investigation after the decision revealed that the residents had been paid to testify by a firm hired by the natural gas industry. One resident who was told she was part of “environmental campaign” grew suspicious after she “was paid to hand out pamphlets featuring the logo of the nation’s largest gas utility, Southern California Gas Company, which is often referred to as SoCalGas.”

SoCalGas was recently fined close to $10 million by the California Public Utilities Commission for misusing consumer money to undermine the state’s climate goals. And despite a shift in corporate rhetoric around climate, the company still plans to rely on methane-intensive natural gas for 80 percent of its energy in 2045.

It is time for SCAQMD to deliver on its critical mission to protect Californians from the health and climate impacts of air pollution, develop a strong Air Plan, and commit to doing its part to help the state achieve a zero-emission economy and reject oil and gas industry influence meant to keep our state tied to burning fossil fuels.

The Climate Accountability Campaign is committed to daylight how the oil and gas industry is contributing to a rigged system in Sacramento and delaying real action by trying to create special deals for themselves.

 

 

(SACRAMENTO, CA) The California Climate Accountability Project (CCAP) is shining a light on legislators who say they support climate action but have accepted tens of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from the oil and gas industry and then failed to support important climate legislation. CCAP launched a statewide advertising campaign today that connects the dots between fossil fuel donations; their agenda to oppose California’s transition to clean energy, buildings, and transportation; and the legislators helping them rig the system in Sacramento.

CCAP released digital ads featuring six California legislators tracking their contributions from oil and gas interests like Chevron, Sempra Energy, and the Western States Petroleum Association:

  • State Senator Steve Glazer
  • State Senator Bob Hertzberg
  • Assemblymember Blanca Rubio
  • State Senator Susan Rubio
  • Assemblymember Tim Grayson
  • Assemblymember Sharon Quirk-Silva

The ads also highlight how these legislators failed to support key bills like AB1395, The Climate Crisis Act, and AB345, which would have created oil drilling buffers for homes and schools.

Diverse statewide and in-district advertising strategies will be employed featuring additional legislators as the campaign moves forward.

“Legislators will have to pick a side,” said Mike Young, political director of California Environmental Voters. “California is contaminated by oil and gas money, and the industry’s influence is stalling climate action and the transition to a clean energy future that the public demands.”

The CCAP campaign is illuminating the pervasive reach of campaign money from fossil fuel companies, even amongst legislators who claim to support climate action. Despite a pledge by the California Democratic Party to refuse to accept campaign contributions from oil and gas interests, 52 percent  of all Democratic Assemblymembers and State Senators took contributions from fossil fuel companies and utilities. CalMatters reports oil companies poured more than $19 million into California political races in the 2017-18 cycle alone in direct campaign contributions and independent expenditure campaigns.

Oil and gas industry lobbyists spend millions more lobbying regulators and state legislators to oppose policy and regulations that would build out renewable energy from clean sources like solar and wind, improve California’s electric vehicle infrastructure, deploy non-polluting electric trucks, and transition California’s buildings to be powered by zero-emissions energy.

“It’s unacceptable that the same oil and gas companies reaping record profits are lobbying our legislature and regulators for special deals and subsidies for industry schemes like carbon capture,” said David Diaz, Executive Director, Active San Gabriel Valley, El Monte (Tongva Territory). “Make no mistake, the fossil fuel industry has a robust agenda to delay and reverse real climate solutions. We need a climate plan that works for Californians, not big polluters.”

Despite Californians’ strong public support for climate action and clean energy solutions and a history of enacting landmark climate policy, the fossil fuel industry’s campaign and lobby investments have been paying off with weakened and stalled climate action.

“For too long, corporate polluters and the legislators beholden to them have avoided scrutiny. That’s about to change,” said Mike Young, political director of California Environmental Voters. “It’s time for our legislators to stand up for the health and future of all Californians, rather than working behind the scenes to protect corporate profits.”

California’s legislators and regulators are currently considering dozens of bills and new regulations that could bolster the state’s climate ambitions, and each will come with a fight against the oil and gas industry’s agenda. CCAP will continue to call attention to the industry’s influence in Sacramento.